Dr Mahrang Baloch Booked in Terrorism
BYC Leader Dr Mahrang Baloch Booked in Terrorism Case Following Travel Ban
The recent case against Dr. Mahrang Baloch, a prominent Baloch rights activist, has brought attention to the ongoing struggle for human rights in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan. Dr Mahrang Baloch booked in terrorism on charges of inciting violence and collaborating with militant groups, just days after being barred from traveling abroad. This article delves into the allegations, responses, and broader implications surrounding this development.
Dr Mahrang Baloch booked in Terrorism
On October 11, 2024, an FIR was registered by Malir district’s Quaidabad police in Karachi against Dr. Mahrang Baloch, accusing her of inciting violence and carrying out anti-state activities. The complaint, lodged by a local resident named Asad Ali Shams, alleged that Dr. Mahrang was involved in anti-national activities in collaboration with the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and other militant groups.
The FIR includes several serious charges under Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) of 1997, such as Section 7 (punishment for acts of terrorism) and Sections 124-A (sedition), 148 (rioting with deadly weapons), 149 (unlawful assembly), 153-A (promoting enmity), 500 (defamation), and 505 (statements inducing public mischief) of the Pakistan Penal Code.
Background: The Travel Ban Incident
Just days before the FIR was filed, Dr. Mahrang was barred from boarding a flight to New York, where she was scheduled to attend a Time magazine gala as part of the Time100Next list honorees. The activist alleged that immigration authorities stopped her without any legal justification, despite holding a valid U.S. visa and an invitation from Time.
At a press conference following the travel ban, Dr. Mahrang claimed that she and her companions were harassed by law enforcement officers. She vowed to challenge the travel restrictions in court, describing the move as a violation of her rights and an attempt to silence her activism.
Dr. Mahrang’s Response to the Terrorism Charges
Dr Mahrang Baloch booked in terrorism is denied by her, calling the charges “fabricated” and a tactic to intimidate her. In a post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), she asserted that the case was an example of the state’s increasing discomfort with her activism. She emphasized that her work is peaceful and focuses on human rights, particularly addressing enforced disappearances in Balochistan.
“The fabricated nature of the case shows how the state has grown increasingly uncomfortable with the activism against enforced disappearances and other rights abuses in Balochistan,” she wrote. Dr. Mahrang stated that such actions are intended to shift the blame for security failures in the region onto activists, adding that she remains undeterred and will continue her struggle through legal means.
The Broader Context: Enforced Disappearances and Activism in Balochistan
Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest but least developed province, has been a focal point of conflict for decades. Allegations of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and human rights violations have been frequently raised by activists and international organizations. The Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), led by Dr. Mahrang, has organized protests and sit-ins in recent months, drawing attention to these issues.
The crackdown on activists and the use of legal measures to suppress dissent have been common tactics in the region. Rights organizations have repeatedly condemned the targeting of Baloch activists, journalists, and students who speak out against state policies. The case against Dr. Mahrang fits into this pattern, raising concerns about freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly.
The Complainant’s Accusations and the State’s Stance
The complainant, Asad Ali Shams, accused Dr. Mahrang of misleading the people of Balochistan and inciting anti-state activities. He alleged that she was collaborating with militant groups to carry out an anti-state agenda. In the FIR, Shams claimed, “I am 100 percent sure that Mahrang Baloch is carrying out anti-national activities in collaboration with BLA terrorists.”
However, the police have not presented any evidence of Dr. Mahrang’s involvement with militant organizations, and even the local Station House Officer (SHO) stated that there was no rally or protest conducted by her on the day of the complaint. This discrepancy raises questions about the motive behind the accusations and whether they are intended to serve as a deterrent against her activism.
Implications for Human Rights and Activism in Pakistan
The case against Dr. Mahrang Baloch underscores the ongoing challenges faced by human rights defenders in Pakistan, particularly those raising concerns about state conduct in conflict-ridden areas. The use of anti-terrorism laws to prosecute activists is not a new phenomenon in Pakistan, but it has drawn criticism from human rights groups who argue that such laws are often misused to stifle dissent.
By targeting prominent activists like Dr. Mahrang, the state risks further alienating Balochistan’s population, where grievances regarding human rights violations and lack of development have long fueled tensions. The case has also attracted international attention, with human rights organizations likely to scrutinize the proceedings closely.
Dr. Mahrang’s Determination to Fight On
Despite the charges ,Dr. Mahrang remains resolute in her stance. She has vowed to fight the case in court, emphasizing that her commitment to the struggle for the Baloch people’s rights will not be deterred. “My peaceful activism will not be deterred by such illegal, unconstitutional, and coercive tactics,” she declared, reiterating her resolve to continue raising awareness about the plight of Balochistan’s missing persons and other issues.
Conclusion
The Dr Mahrang Baloch booked in terrorism is more than just a legal matter; it reflects the broader struggle for human rights and freedom of expression in Pakistan. As the proceedings unfold, they will be closely watched by rights groups, activists, and the international community. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how dissent and activism are handled in the country, particularly in regions where grievances with the state are deeply rooted.
Dr Mahrang Baloch booked in terrorism highlights the complex intersection of activism, security policies, and legal measures in Pakistan, raising important questions about the balance between state security and the right to dissent.
